Jack Dorsey Gets Slammed by Twitter’s Crypto Crowd For Web3 Critique

Twitter boss Jack Dorsey kicked off a serious storm this week, attacking an concept that cryptocurrency fans extensively imagine will result in a brand new daybreak for decentralized finance and the web – the approaching of web3.

Proponents of web3 hail it as a serious revolution of the web, bringing again management and possession of data and belongings exchanged over the net to the individuals. With that promise, it should additionally kill off the function of lots of the giants that dominate the Internet at the moment – specifically the likes of Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.

But Dorsey urged in a tweet – which has been retweeted nearly 7,000 occasions – that in the meanwhile, web3 is extra of a advertising ploy than the rest:

What Dorsey is saying is that not even web3 has what’s required to flee the affect of the enterprise capitalists and liquidity suppliers that run the worldwide internet at the moment.

The tweet was shortly met with an indignant backlash from the hundreds of builders who’re working night time and day to create a web3 entity that’s exactly what Dorsey says it received’t be – an entity free from the affect of VCs. Quickly there emerged a refrain of voices calling out Dorsey for crushing the hopes and goals of a number of courageous individuals, with others claiming that in his naivete he merely doesn’t perceive what’s going on with web3 and subsequently his feedback ought to simply be ignored.

Tesla founder Elon Musk, ever wanting to play an element in all debates crypto, chirped in with a snarky remark that underscores how the very definition of web3 remains to be up for debate:


A extra knowledgeable reply got here from Willy Woo, an on-chain analyst with an enormous following within the crypto group who clearly does know what’s up with web3. In Woo’s opinion we’ve already seen the facility of web3 and the way it allows individuals to wrest again management of a undertaking after they don’t just like the route it’s headed.


Woo was in fact referring to the latest battle between the group at EOS (led by the recently-formed EOS Network Foundation) and its primary developer, Block.One. Concerned by Block.One’s clear lack of dedication to the EOS undertaking, which has struggled to capitalize on its blockbuster $4 billion ICO in 2018, the group earlier this month voted overwhelmingly to kick Block.One from its function main the undertaking, within the course of blocking it from receiving any extra funds.

Block.One had been set to obtain 67 million EOS tokens ($250 million) over the following six-to-seven years, however the group determined it wasn’t working exhausting sufficient and didn’t deserve that cash – so it dropped it altogether.

If that’s not a present of the facility of web3, it’s exhausting to know what’s. The lack of any type of response or combat again from Block.One solely serves to emphasise how little energy it has when the group’s help is pulled out from below its ft.

“Through a super-majority consensus, the EOS network has taken its future in its own hands by voting to fire and stop vesting tokens to them. This begins a new era for EOS and highlights the power of the blockchain to enable a community to stand up against corporate interests that don’t align with theirs,” mentioned Yves La Rose, chief of the EOS Network Foundation.

As it turned out, the response of the livid Twitterati finally prompted Dorsey to contradict himself whereas trying to point out that his tweet was supposed extra as a “critique” that may assist the group to repair any excellent points.


So if web3 is just not fallacious, then how can Dorsey be proper?



Related posts

What Could Trigger A Sharp Decline

Crypto Advisor

Do Senator Lummis And Toomey Bitcoin Holdings Pose Ethical Concerns? Let’s Argue

Crypto Advisor

Bitcoin Shows Recovery Signs and Could Rally Above $40K

Crypto Advisor

Leave a Comment